Why DeAnnex the Crum and COPT/Thatcher Properties?
May 19, 2010 by FofFC
Filed under Addressing the "Northern Annexations" and Development Plans, Crumland Farm, Frederick City, Frederick, Growing Smart with Adequate Public Services, Municipal Growth: addressing the hidden costs of sprawl in New Market, Our Campaigns, Police, Fire and Rescue, Public Health, Roads, Schools, Share your Opinion on Policy, Thatcher Farm, Frederick City, Urban Revitalization and Infill, Volunteer, Water and Sewer
Download the Deannexation Petition for Charter Amendment Here!
Friends of Frederick County Position on Crum and COPT/Thatcher Annexations into Frederick City
We believe that our county and city should protect the Monocacy River corridor, productive farmland, scenic vistas, and a buffer between Frederick and Walkersville. At this time there is adequate development planned in the existing “pipeline” of future development in the city and we should develop that first, see that it is done in the most economically, socially and environmentally sustainable manner, and evaluate its impact before bulldozing greenfields. FoFC believes that existing roads to the north are inadequate, congested and dangerous, and there’s no financial plan to solve that anytime soon.
Background
In September 2009 the City of Frederick’s Mayor and Aldermen[1] voted to annex two farms (total 436 acres) along Route 15 north of Frederick City for 1200 new homes and approximately 2.3 million ft2 of non-residential (office, retail, manufacturing, hotel) space. During the Fall 2009 citizens made a good faith effort to gather 20% of city voter signatures to put these annexations to referendum but fell short of our target due to the 45 day time allowed. Judging from overwhelming citizen involvement in that effort and interest in signing the petition for referendum it was clear that citizens of Frederick City do not agree that the development plans for the Crum and COPT/Thatcher properties promote the health, safety and welfare of our city nor county.
Petition to DeAnnex the Crum and COPT/Thatcher Properties
For these reasons, on May 20th 6:30pm Frederick City Hall Friends of Frederick County launches a petition drive for a charter amendment to change the boundaries of the City of Frederick, MD to exclude the Crum and Thatcher properties.This petition effort, to “de annex” these properties, when put on the ballot will give citizens the opportunity to vote their preference. The petition can be downloaded off the Friends of Frederick County website (http://www.friendsoffrederickcounty.org/by-campaign/petition-deannexation-referendum/ ) and delivered or mailed to our office. Petitions will be available at events; petition drop off points will be announced during the petition drive. Hear what citizens have to say.
Why deannex the Crum and COPT/Thatcher properties from the City limits?
- Route 15 is one of the most dangerous roads in Maryland – and there is little funding for improvements. The northern annexations will add 12-15,000 car trips/day to Route 15 and arterial roads.[2] The Maryland State Highway Administration strongly recommended that the cost of planning, design and construction of the Biggs Ford Road interchange be included in the annexation agreements, that cost is estimated at $75-80 million. It was not. The Monocacy Boulevard completion (to cost $75-$80 m) is not even funded yet.[3]
- There are 3500 homes and millions of square feet of commercial space within Frederick City that should be built first before expanding outward. These approvals include Brick Works, Northgate, Clemson Corner, Market Square, the Ballenger Creek Center and the SAIC-Frederick/NCI facility. For a complete list of commercial projects see: http://www.businessinfrederick.com/site_selection/development.htm
- The annexation agreements for Crumland Farm and COPT/Thatcher do not adequately address sewer, schools and fire and rescue services. There is no planned sewer service for the Crum and Thatcher properties at this point [4] and no detailed plans for school and emergency services.
- This farmland has excellent soil for growing food. If the properties are under Frederick County jurisdiction they will be in an Agricultural Priority Preservation Area (PPA), according to the recently signed Frederick County Comprehensive Plan.
Positions from Voices of Authority
Maryland Department of Planning[5] (7/22/2009) Asks the city to look into potential sewer constraints, the expansive floodplain and the road network impacts in light of the I270/Rte 15 Multi Modal Study.
State Highway Administration[6] SHA strongly recommends that the cost of planning, design and construction of the Biggs Ford Road interchange and park and ride lot be included in the requirements for annexation, as well as dedication of Rte 15 right of way and plans for arterial roads that will need to be constructed once Sunday’s Lane is closed.
Frederick County Board of Commissioners[7] letter dated 9/2/2009 2, 2009: Without concurrent construction plans for an interchange and the elimination of the at-grade crossings “will only exacerbate an already dangerous situation and jeopardize the safety of City and County residents.” “The Crumland Farm Agreement (pg 5) does not obligate Petitioners (meaning the developer) to fund any portion of the US 15/Biggs Ford Road interchange. The County Commissioners and the State Highway Administration believe the developers, rather than the taxpayers, should pay for this interchange.” There is no planned sewer to either property. Absent private funding for a new school this development will worsen school overcrowding.
Frederick County Fire and Rescue Services Division[8] (5/5/2009)on Crumland Farm annexation: “With the potential increase in traffic traveling to the site, thus requiring vehicles to cross Route 15, the potential for accidents will increase. An increase in accidents on Route 15 may have an effect on the fire and rescue services, therefore, the Biggs Ford Road interchange should be constructed and operational before the first Use and Occupancy permit is issued for the proposed site.”
Town of Walkersville[9] (8/31/2009) The Walkersville Burgess and Commissioners voted 3-2 in opposition to both the Crum and COPT/Thatcher annexation proposals and urged the Frederick City Board of Alderman to vote to deny them.
Monocacy Scenic River Citizens Advisory Board River Board (5/11/2009) expresses concern about the proposed alteration of the natural landscape in the 100-year floodplain on the COPT/Thatcher property and the disruption of environmental processes and functions that follow from grading, filling, and building in a floodplain—mainly the natural storage and conveyance of flood waters.
Does your organization have a position? If so, please send it to deannexation@friendsoffrederickcounty.org.
[1] Frederick City Elected Officials, September 2009 (Mayor Jeff Holtzinger and Aldermen Marsha Hall, Alan Imhoff, Kip Koontz, Donna Kuzemchak, Paul Smith), Frederick City MD.
[2] Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, pp 268-269.
[3] Thomas, John B. (Pers Comm May 2010). Cost for Biggs Ford Road interchange at Route 15, and the Monocacy Boulevard interchange, Frederick County Division of Planning.
[4] Tax map 57 and 48 at: http://www.frederickcountymd.gov/index.aspx?NID=1326.
[5] Conrad, Peter G., Director, Local Government Assistance, Maryland Department of Planning.
[6] Slater, Gregory I, Director, Office of Planning and Preliminary Engineering, State Highway Administration
[7] Board of County Commissioners, September 2009 (Jan Gardner, David Gray, John L Thompson, Kai J Hagen and Charles Jenkins), Frederick County MD.
[8] Dmuchowski, Michael P, Battalion Chief/Fire Marshall, Frederick County MD
[9] Hauver, Susan J, Planning and Zoning Administrator, Walkersville MD




Comments
One Response to “Why DeAnnex the Crum and COPT/Thatcher Properties?”Trackbacks
Check out what others are saying about this post...[...] Why DeAnnex the Crum and COPT/Thatcher Properties? | Friends of Frederick County says: May 19, 2010 at 10:08 pm [...]